Research

17/09/2018 - 22/09/2018 MA2 Extension, research and play.

Extension, research and play.

How do we extend practice -towards what?

Opening our practice/research up to different disciplines, inputs, outputs and/or collaborations; considering the possibilities of what can feed into our practice and what can also come out of it and for whom. What products and/or by-products do we generate, who is consuming or could consume them?

As an artist how can you extend your practice physically; perhaps by building on existing and/or incorporating new skills, adding breadth and/or depth to media manipulations, and/or exploring the time a space of art making? In another aspect, the research undertaken as an artist can be more refined, deeper, digging into territories that excite and enliven a practice. Considering how the work is consumed by the audience; are they viewer, consumer, participant, victim or judge? Do they have a choice, is that a factor? Will they have an input, an output or a takeaway?

If these queries are responded to the practice may develop depth and breadth that can be witnessed/experienced by both the artist and the audience. Challenges push towards improvement and clarity.

Personal:

Going forward areas for extension are:

  • Refine my research - focus, stop trying to cover so much that the message is diluted by conflicting and confusing messages.
  • Explore my palette - the limitations of colour choice may be holding the work back, let colour feed in as necessary and be a considered part of the work. Stop resisting it.
  • Audience and installation - entanglement is a theme that I have also resisted through fear of complications and lack of skills - PLAY with this.

How are we curious materially and yet focussed?

I don’t know how to answer this question clearly. I think this is because I am too curious materially and lack focus. My focus is my research practice which I have been developing for the best part of 3 years but gets swept up into tangents. These tangents allow for other questions and concepts to emerge but these make the physical work muddly and therefore tend to get logged and then stored as I attempt to restrict my concepts in an effort to maintain a focused practice. My thoughts work so fast due to my mental make-up that I have a tendency to run away with ideas and miss out large chunks of physical development as I have mentally processed the possible outcomes and decided on a path without physical exploration. The challenge has been to ensure that the development and exploration happens and is detailed and justified, a task that feels complex and slow. My material practice has suffered due to this as I don’t stay with something for very long (other than the tracings). I long to develop a piece over time but worry that the lack of quantity will be judged.

Purposeful play

This feels so relevant, it's now a part of my life due to my assigned roles of both Mother and Teacher, an aspect that has been somewhat absent in my practice due to being out of the teaching profession for a few years. Most of the cohort are teachers, of this I am aware. But I question how much we now look to play to move our students through their work, or is it a series of repetitive tasks to tick off assessment criteria and fill out the necessary paperwork. Do we work with our students, model best practice or ‘practice what we preach’ as the saying goes? I’m feeling invigorated to be teaching again, to have those moments in the classroom and the workshop where the simple task of joining in brings a new idea or dimension to my work. By removing the weight of research and context and simply making, how can I transform my practice, what doors with metaphorically open, what opportunities will show themselves?

What ideas and concepts are preoccupying you within your practice?

I’m still very much enthralled with the repetition of ‘daily life’ and the events of chaos that stir up the mundane. Feeding into this is the aspect of assigned gender roles and a thirst for philosophical knowledge (I just can’t stop listening to philosophy podcasts and reading!). Since the beginning of March, I have been working with a research group looking into the role of the Manifesto in art and this research has bought up some questions regarding the concepts behind art, the allocation of work to movements and the thinking behind the movements.

Currently, I feel an urge to move away from my sparse fragmented images into dense heavy pieces. Upon reflection, I can see this is a reaction to the now dense calendar I have, the weight of responsibilities, and commitments that now need to be negotiated.
Are there areas from the research that you did last year that you feel need more interrogation?

Since completing the contextual study I have a desire to explore the aspect of taking up space, navigating around a space and the physicality and illusion of form in space; linking to the manner in which we navigate around chaos both large and small, physical and mental.

What do you want to find out more about that could inform your practice?

Performance - I’m full of fear regarding performative art but am now considering how to make the audience the performers such as Gustav Metzer’s Crawl Space which I recently experienced in Abu Dhabi. The thought of performing is both thrilling and terrifying but perhaps I can navigate around that obstacle by enlisting the consumers of the artwork as the unwitting performers of it as well.

21/09/2018 - Gallery Visit: Ways of Seeing, NYUAD Gallery, Abu Dhabi.

Fred Sandback and Hassan Sharif fulfilled my vision

Gustav Metzger challenged my thinking

Grayson Perry tickled my fancy

David Claerbout blew my mind

James Turrell comforted my soul.

Grayson Perry, A Map of Days, 2013, etching from four plates, 119.5 x 161 cm (my photos of artwork)

James Webb, Scream, 2008, signed certificate, speakers, assorted wires, audio, museum barrier, dimensions variable (my photos of artwork)

img_2762

Cindy Sherman, Untitled #466, 2008, colour photograph, 246.1 x 162.6 cm (my photos of artwork)

img_2748

Hans-Peter Feldman, One on One (milky Way), 2012, chocolate box and sign, dimensions variable

(my photos of artwork)

img_2720

Andreas Gursky, Dubai World I, 2007, c-print, 307 x 223.3 x 6.2 cm (my photos of artwork)

Michelangelo Pistoletto, METRO QUADRATO INFINITO, 1966/2018, sculpture, string, 240 x 240 cm (my photos of artwork)

Gustav Metzger, To Walk Into - Massacre on the Mount, Jerusalem, November 8, 1990. 1996/2018, photograph on PVC and linen cover, 238 x 395 x 30 cm (my photos of artwork)

David Claerbout, The Algiers' Section of a Happy Moment, 2008, single-channel video projection, b/w, stereo, 37 mins (my photos of artwork)

James Turrell, Alta (Pink), 1968, cross corner projection, dimensions variable (my photos of artwork)

Hassan Sharif, Knots, 2012-2016, cotton rope and stainless steel, 380 x 350 cm (my photos of artwork)

Sharif fills the space - the opposite of how I'm told he was as a person. The rope and knots are so clear yet lost in mass. It was higher when I saw it last - it took up less floor space and it felt like you could walk in to it - this feels deflated, or maybe growing tired from moving from place to place. 

Fred Sandback, Untitled (Sculptural Study, Twenty-two-part Vertical Construction), 1991/2018, black and red acrylic yarn, dimensions variable (my photos of artwork)

I want to lie on the floor, I want to ping it and run about in them.

Not Pictured: Kim Tschang-Yeul - water drop -a painting and a reference - does the artist want you to look at both, are they the same - is one incidence and one action?

Not pictured: Gustav Metzger - Historic Photographs: To Crawl Into - Anschluss, Vienna, March 1983, 1996/2011 - the linen was so heavy, my shoulders ached from bearing the weight - the actual weight and the metaphoric weight - the women in the large photo are scrubbing the floor while children look on - I crawl on top of them struggling to lift the fabric to see them, I haven't seen them before, I don't know them but for a moment I'm with them, in a similar position but with the privilege of choice, of participation, rights - can I ever emphasise? do I need to? is the moment enough - a token -its history, past, I cannot change.

  

Mon, 17 September - Introduction to MA 2 - KF (CW between 17:00 - 18:30)

In a new exercise for this year, I will be sharing my session notes. These are the moments when I have thoughts about my own practice which are intertwined with the dialogue and other members works. Sometimes they will make sense, many times they probably won't. It allows me to store those moments that feel so urgent at the time and need to be preserved for the times when 'the desert is a little dry' or 'the fog is a little dense'.Session outline (from google calendar):Introduction to MA 2 - KF (CW between 17:00 - 18:30)DescriptionSummary of Unit: Testing Your Boundaries, Intersections and Articulations, Risks, Failures and Learning NB Exploratory Project, the exploration continues Introduction, including information on continual reflection and evaluation in journals and active contribution in group sessions Share summer experience in small groups. Aims for the year ahead, verbally and in journals

Notes:
Testing practice
Contextual awareness
Audience
Testing boundaries - put work into the public
This is the year to make ideas visible
engaged maker - trying it out
resources for each other - share knowledge
Formulaic provocations
disparate and joined
materiality of practice - how it changes people.
Materially grounded.
In what routes to we communicate these narratives.
extending, commitment, curiosity, creatively minded
contextualised practice - social, ethical, political
How do we know our ideas are being manifest?
What do I want to test in my practice? Why?
Patience within my practice - tackling my ADHD and actually spending time on doing something, allowing it to evolve and not imparting expectations.
What, why, how am I doing it?
Who is it for?
So what? - Who cares?
Vulnerability and responsibility.
Testing boundaries -
create work and out in public that you wouldn't normally, i.e.: not white cube - instead park bench
gather data and see communication
who is it for?
loyal to a piece of work you don't want to be loyal to any more.
Performative?
our work doesn't care about us once its out there!
fight the algorithm - reject or don't fight - find the difficult things.
the exhibition that I remember are the ones that irritated.
Kimberley Foster - Tate exchange
cake - throwing it all together to make a new cake
Allan Kaprow - the blurring of art and life
attention alters what is attended.
General booklist - reading - add your content
microphone - contact microphone, hydrophone
sounds of things
Stephen Pippin - pinhole camera.

07/06/2018 - Evaluation and reflection: Task 2 & Task 5 Exploratory Project

EvaluationMy project is a journey through experiments and materials, a gathering of mini explorations that link together like branches of a tree. Without the need for a defined outcome, the Exploratory project was the perfect opportunity to 'play' and work inside different disciplines without judgement or expectation. The ideal space to dip into techniques to expand my horizons. Next, I would like to hone into one thing and exhaust it, explore it as far as I can.Takeaways: okay to be multidisciplinary, try things out, use the opportunity to experiment.What pushed me? fear of failure, excitement in techniques.Alongside wanting to do well and push my practice I was urged on by my own excitement in the processes and outcomes of each of the experiments. When something became stuck or didn't offer an immediate resoltion I was able too to put it down and move on to another area of the project.Sculpture: not yet comfortable & resisted so didn't see it through. The use of the laser cutter and unfamiliar materials seemed to be a step too far for me, I wasn't able to progress in this area as much as I would have liked.Books: materiality - only just touched on material exploration. In Tutor and Peer critiques, the books were received relatively well, there was interest in them as books and as art objects once sealed with paint, however, the materiality was questioned. I began to experiment with paper making but was not able to explore bookmaking with my own paper on the timescale.Scale: I resisted large scale for fear of not completing & challenging timescale - wanted to get the most out of the project. Again the personal issue of fear of failure held me back here, I did not want to start a large piece that showed slow progress for a project that was about exploring. I wanted to use the time as effectively as possible, so maintained smaller works to allow for more outcomes, I wanted quantity in this instance.Could push materials further - explore the stitched paper & its delicacy. The use of handmade paper and how the stitch interacts with it.Digital: needing to acquire new skills, self-taught studio set up, lighting, stop-go, adobe premier - I taught myself basic video creation and editing skills during this project which was fun and quite fulfilling. I am happy with the test videos I have created, I think there is more scope for using video as a medium to record performance.My expectations of making and the resistance to outsource - laser cutter or manufacturing - I am a traditionalist at heart and find it difficult to put value into concepts rather than material so if the work is created by other on my behalf I am challenged by this. I would like to place this directly into the work, consider if I can create work that requires the audience to do the 'making'.Destruction of work: - removal of 'precious' feelings towards work and seeing it all for what it is. Unpicking work became a piece in itself and the outcome was aesthetically pleasing. I absolutely loved this aspect of the work, both the dipping of the books and the unpicking of the textiles that was filmed. It was liberating to not feel chained to a final piece, to allow them to evolve into something more and something else.Overall the risk-taking aspect was the most profound takeaway from this project. I wish to make work and to destroy it, or evolve it with another process.The submission:It feels so small. It's tough to really pull your work into a small sendable package for assessment. To work out how you might be able to tell you story/express your thoughts in a succinct manner in a few pieces.It was however also quite cathartic and liberating to find that I could express my work in a minimal way.img_2024img_2034img_2023img_2030.jpgimg_2032.jpgimg_2036img_2020.jpgimg_2026img_2028.jpg

Exploratory Project - Wk 12 - extended - Video

Video works:I created several video works for the project. One was a Stop-Go Animation,[vimeo 273833616 w=640 h=360]516748 K VennerWoodbridge Video Fractured Foam from Katie Venner-Woodbridge on Vimeo.I did not create a storyboard or plan for this. I cut up some foam that was supplied by a friend and set about creating a small sequence. I wanted to explore order and chaos in a very simplified format that would still maintain the air of my work. By looping the video it reflects the daily routines and repetitions that I am so fond of and displays the way they ebb and flow. In hindsight, the material was not great and moved very easily if there was a breeze etc. I would also make a storyboard next time to make sure that the piece flowed steadily and developed into a more choreographed piece.After a tutorial with Kimberley Foster, we discussed the temporaryness of the drop collage pieces and I decided I would turn them into a performance and record it.[vimeo 273836648 w=640 h=360]516748 K VennerWoodbridge Video Performance Drop Collage sml from Katie Venner-Woodbridge on Vimeo.This piece as has a timelapse but I couldn't get the file to edit properly. I watched it on the camera and it felt so rushed I was happy to keep the real-time video. The element of sweeping the pieces away and starting afresh is cleansing, like a good night sleep. If the pieces don't land favourable, sweep them away and drop them again. Having chance play a role through the act of dropping also brings another element of chaos into the work. I would like to take this to a larger audience and allow participants to create the work and ask their reactions, so if they feel the need to stop when they have a favourable layout etc.Lastly, I created a large Performance piece, this was after speaking to Les Bicknell and his suggestion of making a systematic piece. It had also come up in a previous group critique. I set about planning pieces and drew out a 4x4 (5cm each so 20cm x 20cm) square on a piece of cloth. I then set up a filming area and proceeded to set a timer for 10 minutes and an alarm to remind myself to do the task daily. I tested the fabric would work first on a scrap.img_1614 img_1607.jpgimg_1616  img_1622I proceeded to punch embroider everyday for 10mins inside on of the squares, a couple of the day I didn't finish, the rest I had to stitch over as I was faster than expected.img_1653img_1695img_1699 img_1723img_1719Once I had done the first 16days I began to unpick the work. This did not need a timer. I systematically unpicked each square carefully bundling up the yarn for display afterwards. This is in honour of Hassan Sharif's piece "Cotton" pictured below. Which is a video installation alongside the artefact of the lump of cotton her created.

Hassan Sharif, Cotton (still), 2013. Cotton and single-channel HD video, silent, 20 x 67 x 46 cm, 8 minutes 26 seconds. Courtesy Estate of Hassan Sharif and Gallery Isabelle van den Eynde, Dubai. http://sharjahart.org/press/sharjah-art-foundation-presents-landamrk-hassan-sharif-retrospective-i

img_1727img_1731 img_1733img_1771 img_1770 img_1760img_1923img_1773.jpgThe video would be displayed alongside the artefacts and played on a loop. It is 3:36 hr: mins long. I chose to leave it like this as the point of the use of the techniques was its rhythmic movement and sound. It is tedious to watch, mirroring the common thought fo the 'daily grind' but in its sum creates a textile piece. As the chaos ensues ans it comes apart a different, perhaps more aesthetically pleasing textiles arises.[vimeo 273833967 w=640 h=360]516748 K VennerWoodbridge Video Performance deConstruct from Katie Venner-Woodbridge on Vimeo

Exploratory Project - Wk 11 - 29/04/2018- 05/05/2018 - paper making

Moving through the materiality criticisms of my handmade books I decided to make paper at home. I had to create my own equipment as I could not find any in the area to purchase and to buy it was expensive with long delivery times.img_1446My initial batches were coarse and grey as I was using a substandard blender and the paper had a lot of printer ink on it. It was also heavily textured due to the fabric I was using to place it on. I replaced that and fixed the other teething problem and created some almost white paper. I was trying to maintain an element of transparency but this proved to be very difficult with the paper tearing and breaking up.img_1777  img_1801Once I dry I did some ink experiments with the pieces. Because the paper doesn't go through any finishing processes it is absorbent and allows the ink to bleed through. I think this could be made a feature but where it absorbs too much ink it very quickly disintegrates.img_1806  img_1809img_1814I next used threads in the process of papermaking, laying them on and in the paper solution as I was creating the sheets. This relies on the paper fibres to hold the thread in place and is not the most secure way of doing it. After a short time, the threads began to come away from the paper. I also sandwiched the threads between sheets but this rendered the paper very thick and the threads not as visible.img_1798  img_1782img_1821 img_1817I do really find something pleasing about the piece that created holes, this unperfect aspect in an art form that prides itself on perfection moves me back into the thinking of chaos and order.img_1829I did stitch a piece but it doesn't photograph well, this is a piece of Japanese paper that was also stitched. It holds the threads well whereas my handmade paper tore quickly and I abandoned stitching it further to save the piece. Perhaps the next point would be to continue until is does destroy itself and see what happens.  

Exploratory Project - Wk 10 - 22/04/2018- 28/04/2018 - Textile

Textile:I've decided to use these journal posts to bring all the elements of one branch of investigation together to keep it coherent and not seem all over the place.I have a strong textile background and have resisted working in textiles for a long time before starting this course due to bad critique experiences and my own self depreciation.It feels natural to me to work in fibre. The touch is comforting and the techniques are often repetitive and meditative. This is a strong presence in my work looking at routines and the mundane every day, the things that get overlooked.I've been considering how touch can evoke emotion for the contextual study and realised that for me touch plays a big part in self-soothing stress and also helping to understand how things work or are made, babies touch everything! Yet the arts tend to forbode touch, and this is something I am looking to consider in my work. Textile Artist Maxine Bristow talks about touch and how we interact with fabric in public places such as buses and trains.Home-page-slider-new1.jpg

http://www.maxinebristow.com/

Rug making is full of touch and normally trodden on in bare feet. Rugs have also been used to adore walls and demarcate areas. The process of Latchwork is a simple pull-through know made using a hook and canvas.img_1495img_1513.jpgBelow the back can be seen, its relatively straight lines and the top is more chaotic.img_1914 img_1910I am considering how this would work on a large scale where the height of the pile can be changed and the textures would highlight the geometric structure further.I also used crossstitch, and punch stitch to explore how these geometric can translate in to stitch.img_1905  img_1882img_1892 img_1900I found them frustrating. I longed for density in these pieces either by layering transparent fabric over each other or by building up textures and stitch density. There is a long way to go with the textile aspect of this exploration.