Jan '19

Mon, 28 January 2019 - Writing workshop - CW and Karl Foster - CREATIVE WRITING

Writing workshop - CW and Karl F

Pre-workshop email exchange:

Questions from Karl Foster:

Where are you?

KVW: Lost. Time lost. Frustrated. Back to work this year and struggling with time management. I know it can be done, others are doing it but I’m troubled to find the right route. There is a need for words, tactility, movement, repetition, geometry, fracturing, collisions.

Where are the writing troubles?

KVW: Weeding through the research. Adding something new. Self-conscious of repetition or inadequate arguments. Inferiority complex. Loss of voice, or lack of voice, need to develop a voice. Authority - where is it and who has it? WHAT AM I GOING TO WRITE ABOUT! How do I maintain interest and passion? Do I want to give my passions to the task, will it rob them from me after scrutiny?

Where are the pleasures associated with writing through, about, or within practice?  

KVW: In practice: the pleasures are the release of writing. The satisfaction of rhythm and format on a page. The flow of a journey, both physical and psychological.

Through practice: the noting of a journey. Sketchbook time capsules capturing thoughts and progressions. Holding ideas for when they are ready. Gathering moments, instances, mundane information whose purpose is yet to be discovered.

About practice: the research, finding like-minded writers and researchers, but that's not really about writing, that's about reading.

How does writing help with practice?

KVW: Both clarifying and overloading, writing works its way through practice to strengthen it, as the foundations of a construction. Organizing the bricks into a structure that grows from a muddled pile. Sometimes the writing foundations' sprawl, confusing the practice structure, but further writing helps guide the foundations in the right manner. Context, direction, focus, plans, support.

How does practice help with writing?

KVW: I’m not sure it does yet! The writing is taking over, practice is falling by the wayside in the need for time and attention.

Introduction to the work of Francis Ponge. I read his piece 'rain' (https://www.poetryfoundation.org/), it's stunning. His ability to paint a picture with words is incredible, I closed my eyes and I felt like I was watching the rain with him. From this, I went on to explore the poetry society website and discovered their many podcasts which I am now devouring. 

Response from Karl Foster:

Thank you very much for your responses the the questions that I asked, and I am glad that you found the writing of Ponge interesting / useful.
I find the idea of writing as being a form or place for  'Holding ideas for when they are ready’ very interesting. This seems to account for one way of thinking about the importance of writing for visual or creative practice; another way of thinking about it is, perhaps, is as a way of accounting for ideas during or after ‘readiness'. I think ‘gathering’ is a good metaphor for the first use, it also looks like some of the practice-based images I have seen on your website - they look like gatherings of things - like murmurations. I think it is important to think about how words might help with the sorting and sifting of what has been gathered without it being an oppressive force. From my perspective, this is the interplay between the creative and the critical. By way of mitigating what is described by you as the negative effects of writing, I would suggest that you turn it continuously back to practice, give it a place alongside what you make, with the knowledge that it is one species of writing. It might also help to see the writing of others as material that you can use rather than something that is just read. If there are two species of writing here, how might you form hybrid that better serves your practice? Other people’s writing might provide a constructed matrix of anchor-points that enable you to exist in the centre of your visual making and thinking.

The session: slightly late due to a commitment.

Notes -

how do you define your territory?
making writing about and a part of practice rather than 'just a component to the course.
keywords that pop up over and over
what words keep coming up and 'flagging' up in your practice - defining your territory -

Form questions around this - How does, what does, why does?

Questions - in what ways might chance procedures increase the chances of not knowing in practice - 'happy accidencts"

Randomness - john cage - Fluxus - surrealism

negative capabilities - Keats

searching after fact and reason

what is important about not knowing? do we need some unknown entities? is art if it's fully known?

Resources:
google scholar
zotero - free software - organizing - popularise it with subjects and keywords - collecting references

The context around our making - a critical review of work but positioned in contemporary practice - what questions are you asking within your work - related to other writings, artists -
who what where when why how -

being 'with' something and establishing what is subjective and what is objective

Talk about excavating and digging the words from my practice - interestingly most people used water metaphors - diving in, immersion etc - Mine is about tactility, excavating, digging and movement - I mention flow once - am I an excavator, an archaeologist, a historian? a constructor laying foundations, a builder? a gatherer. a collector, treasure hunter? A  sorter, an organiser, a tidy-er.

consider the different types of writing I have produced - for uni, practice, pgce, etc

objectivity is hard to come by - we don't know and we only scratch the surface.

karen barad

the type of righting - 'circluar and the imagery they produce'

an account of what happened - a descriprtion of practice - of process - an uttereance of

an object as a stimulus for writing - a response - ithoughts map - gherasim luca -

protocol - use of dictation software - collecting thoughts - collecting research -- getting something wrong -

Karl plays a piece of work - the Prince of my fingers - its a spoken piece by a voice speaking the writing that was initially text that came from dictation. The rhythm and the process 0 the movement of the words, the speed was intense at times due to the punctuation and the length of words, them there were pauses. It took me on a visual and tactile journey though words, it felt familiar, how my own through work. how I speak and explain my work. How I explore, how I look, how I question. the internet was breaking it up, the chance encounter of the breaking and disruption of the sounds, changed the way we absorbed the piece, I question if we all experienced it differently. The volume, the connection, the speed, the sound quality, too much bass, not enough bass,

a higher degree of not knowing, and greater control in the process - writing from doing -

say what you are going to say, say it, say what you have said - introduction, main body, conclusion - start in the middle and work out - 2000 words - chop of the front and back - 1500, 2-3 point about practice - divide that in to 3 and its 500 words each point - thats not a lot!

stick to a plan, hold off for as long a s possible - introduce creative writing to evidence how it fits in practice - if the information is not supporting your argument it has no place to be there - you can construct the same argument in images - three images to tell the story - write out the images - of your practice or someone else practice - what do you want from the image? if you start from the introduction first you will result in a writing car crash COLLISION

argument? they to convince someone of something or of points that you've recognized - each pint - one quote for one pint - sometimes two - making sure things are relevant and not just for the sake of t - each paragraph need to add value - conclusion should identify what you have collected -

how do you frame the creative accept for what you are doing? can you think critically - not taking for granted - need to evidence your creativity -

quote at the beginning to anchor - no quote at the end as it will need to be unpacked and there is no room for that - writing in a way that suits you, don't fake it, not colloquial - but in a style that is familiar - finding the comfort -

SO WHAT? why is it important? - WHY?

reference Deleuze and Guattari - and that they are referenced so much ---- is it necessary -

be affected by the work - be respectful of the work as well - take responsibility for what you write - do it for your self to understand something of your self and your development - how can you separate your self

break

Karl discusses that things were are interested in will find a way in - he then references a previous students who spoke about the 'void' and referenced Balka's "how it is? instillation in the turbine hall - which made me smile as I can't let that go. the tactility and the experience has stayed so solidly with me - the opposite of the void that she spoke of - i looked for the concrete, the hard wall - the tactility of the soft velvet and its comfort -

do justice to a tiny object in our house

-pick an object and write about it-

you tarnish me,
my fingers are dirty, you dirty me
I'm dirty
you're soft in a hard form
you make marks, but not alone
you need me to make marks, you mark me


I need you to make marks

I inhale you, I don't want to but you are there,
In my breath,
uninvited,
tiny invasions
violations,
creeping into my orifices,
under my nails,
in the cracks of my skin,
on my skin

I need you,
I use you,
you use me to spread yourself,
I spread you,
you disseminate across the surface,
across me,
on to my skin.


Its dark,
you're dark,
you make me dark,
I use you lightly but you are still darker than the light,
I make you darker,
not darker than yourself,

You touch me, I touch you, we come together,
we collide,
I make a collision using you.
I use you

There is sound,
you are silent but your movement makes sound,
I move you to make sound,
you and I generate sound,
we generate,
generate sound, marks, dust, traces,
little traces of touch.
I no longer have you but you're still with me.
I see you.
I feel you.
you make me dirty.

I wash.


*compressed Charcoal*

I write about my relationship to things - to acts or objects - materiality - tactility - traces -

Share the words -

RT: its shape and its reach - its atomic mass and light and how it is perceived - reflection and refraction - travelling - stars and how light travels from the stars, how we see light and its distance.

Me: sensuality - touch -

metaphors we live by - a book - the fabric of writing

Bruno Latour -

What are the keywords from my writing? how do they fit in with my practice? have you googled the keyword as an academic term - epidemiology of the word -

reviews are not until 18th Feb - share before if we can - conversation that have happened to inform the writing and take it forward -

Monday, 7 Jan 2019 - 21st Jan Asynchronous Seminar (drawn from issues raised in Krzysztof‘s lecture) - CW

Asynchronous Seminar (drawn from issues raised in Krzysztof‘s lecture) - CW
When Monday, 7 Jan 2019 Description Via LMS, written contributions over two weeks

On Thursday, 17 January 2019 05:17:35 UTC+4, Jo Nichols wrote:
Is it the artist not the art that drives its value? If we look to the Vermeer fake this certainly is true. The gate keepers of the art world, the institutions and the gallery owners certainly seem to hold the power as they can set the price, push the sale, hype the artist. Therefor if one chooses to work out side of such institutions the struggle for financial success is much grater and artists are not necessarily good business people able to push their own works worth. The artists however who make the artwork hold the top trump cards as the institutions would have no currency to trade without them. 

My first response on seminar was to Jo's point (see above quote): To reply to Jo's point, regarding whether it is the artist, not the art that drives its value, I would agree with this and take it a step further. The art market works to trends as do almost all markets. This leads to gallerists, curators and institutions seeking artwork made by a particular group of artists who are in favour at the time. Does this lead us to a point where the work isn't as important as an artist might like to think it is, but rather their gender, race, biography, struggles etc speak more to the consumer than the work itself does? Would the work still be in favour if it was produced by an artist coming to the art market with a more 'privileged' backstory? 

Second response purely to lecture: Does removing oneself from the art world simply bring about isolation and loss of confidence or does it feed integrity? - I've recently discussed this question with a group of artists in the studio I am a member of. We discussed the aspect of visibility, and what would it mean to be invisible, how could we become invisible and let the artwork speak for itself? There is an element of creating 'dead art' by removing oneself from the art world. If work is not seen than can it be classed as professional work or merely an act to pass the time? Does the work itself have more integrity if the bias surrounding artist biographies is removed? If all artworks could be viewed in neutrality would it lead to purer/truer readings, literally allowing the work to speak for itself? - hide quoted text -

Elaine's response to me: interesting question Katie, I guess for me it depends on your audience. I think bios, statements etc can be helpful in giving the audience some kind of ‘in’ into the work, I remember in college for our degree show our department advocated for no statement, title, name but audience were frequently asking some kind of information on the works. I also remember writing a paper on anonymous artists where I found that anonymous artists were really playing the same game only without a name re publicity,  even inviting press to talk and write about the work. 

My third response, this time to Elaine: I agree Elaine, regarding the anonymous artists, we all have to play the same game regarding publicity and getting work out there. The one thing is that an anonymous artist really has to make sure the work speaks for itself if they don't have the additional resource of biography for insight. On the other hand, it may allow them to comment on issues that they may otherwise be criticised for if their identity was in the public, ie: white artists commenting on race relations, or male artists commenting on feminism. In these situations, the strength may be in the fact that the artist is an unknown and that work is viewed for its narrative. If the artist's identity was exposed they may be criticised for coming from a place of privilege or domination regardless of whether their work had a strong and positive impact. - show quoted text -

Mozhdeh response to me and Elaine: @Katie, ‘Yes’ a good art speak but as you and Elaine mentioned publicity is important in the contemporary world of art, it seems in the art today 'the artist is a part and it's not a part' of its work of art. 
Although the intention of being an anonymous artist has some interesting aspects and differences for some artists and the curiosity of being an unnamed artist maybe grab attention, the success of that is still conditional and very much depend on 'anonymous publicity'! @Elaine as Elaine points out. 
In the other hand I think the form of art play the main role in this matter, as for some art forms it not possible to be unknown, as the artist is the main element in the existence of artwork, and also the artist location and geographical, cultural ability, knowledge, and understanding of art and this concept is something to be considered!!
Talking about the geographical matters and possibilities bring to my mind this question ‘who is the anonymous artist? the artist who chosen to be behind her/his work of art or who has been forced to be a kind of 'muted artist' under regional, political, cultural, race, gender, identity etc. sensitivity and or pressure of its surroundings!! How much these issues effects on artist activities and or limited the ways and choices for the artist and or being an artist?


Mon, 14 January 2019 - Work Exchange - Whole MA Cohort

Work exchange - whole cohort experimental session, Caroline, Les and Kimberly.

This session was a first for the MA. Having the new platform for video communication has opened up horizons it seems and our excitable tutors were ready to test it out! The only preparation we had was to expect a package and have some dry art materials to hand. I was impressed by the dedication to getting everyone involved, even the lack of a mail system in the middle east didn't stop them as Les diligently couriered packages to myself, Mozhdeh and Rhoda. We were the last to receive them, and I believe possibly the only ones out of our year group to not accidentally open them.

What are my thoughts:
This envelope contains a piece of work that Les has started, we will be given prompts throughout. the same prompts to produce different outcomes similar to the drawing walk I did at college and do with my own students. It has the potential to feed into all of our practices if we are embedded in our work enough that it shows evidence in this piece. Some of us will hate this task, feeling uncomfortable and frustrated. Some of us will be non-plused about it, and some will love it, thriving in the anticipation and collaboration. I am hoping to thrive, I'm excited. Tired but excited.
What did anticipation feel like? - my anticipation was shorter, or was it? I wanted to receive it, or to open it?

3 things about the act of opening the envelope?
awkward, I'm quite small, tiny hands, it was clumsy to open it on screen.
inquiring, what is in this envelop? what state would it be in?
relief, the burden of a full envelop that is full but has unknown content.

  1. make an aperture
  2. make a screenshot looking through the aperture at the screen

cut an aperture

cut an aperture (image 2)

Text for the reading from Les performed: What makes Argia different from other cities is that it has earth instead of air.
Fill a small bowl or jug with ice cold water and put near the stove.
In that empire, the craft of cartography attained such perfection that the map of a single province covered the space of an entire city
Grease a tin of approx. 30 x 20cm.
and the map of the empire itself an entire province.
Put all the ingredients, apart from the vanilla, into a large, heavy bottomed pan and bring to the boil,
The streets are completely filled with dirt, clay packs the rooms to the ceiling, on every stair another stairway is set in negative,
stirring constantly.
over the roofs of the houses hang layers of rocky terrain like skies with clouds.
In the course of time, these extensive maps were found somehow wanting
Boil for 12-20 minutes, still stirring all the time, until the mixture is golden and,
the College of Cartographers evolved a map of the empire that was of the same scale as the empire and that coincided with it point for point. We do not know if the inhabitants can move about the city,
when a bit is dropped into the water, it turns solid but still squidgy
widening the worm tunnels and the crevices where roots twist:
How long this takes depends on how ferociously it bubbles as well as on the properties and dimensions of the pan.
the dampness destroys people's bodies and they have scant strength;
This is hot work!
everyone is better off remaining still, prone; anyway, it is dark.
The following generations, less attentive to the study of cartography,
came to judge a map of such magnitude cumbersome
From up here, nothing of Argia can be seen;
and quite useless and it was abandoned to the rigours of sun and rain.
When the fudge is at soft-ball stage, very carefully remove the pan from the stove and stir in the vanilla.
In the western deserts, tattered fragments of the map are still to be found sheltering an occasional beast or beggar;
Preferably using an electric whisk beat for about five minutes,
by which time the fudge will have thickened to the texture of stiff peanut butter -
some say, "It's down below there,"
in all the land, no other relic is left of the discipline of geography.
and we can only believe them.
this is quite steamy and strenuous - and pour and push into the prepared tin. Smooth the top as well as you can.
The place is deserted. At night, putting your ear to the ground, you can sometimes hear a door slam.
Put in the fridge to cool, but don't keep it there for more than 2 hours, or it will set too hard, then remove and using a sharp knife, cut into squares.
This is not a geometrically accurate term, as you can see from my cutting skills. - text from Les

My response: squares on the pages - the size of the tin

reaction to reading by Les

consider - what are you listening for? what sticks, how do we react

Text for the reading from Caroline - small agency of worms

Bennett J (2010) Vibrant Matter: a political ecology of things, London: Duke University Press pp 95 The "Small Agency" of Worms

Darwin watched English worms: many, many of them for many, many hours. He watched how they moved, where they went, and what they did, and, most of all, he watched how they made topsoil or "vegetable mould": after digesting "earthly matter," they would deposit the castings at the mouth of their burrows, thus continually bringing to the surface a refined layer of vegetable mould. It is, writes Darwin, “a marvellous reflection that the whole of the . . . mould over any . . . expanse has passed,and will again pass, every few years through the bodies of worms. But the claim with which Darwin ends his Formation of Vegetable Mould through the Actions of Worms with Observations on Their Habits (1881) is not about biology or agronomy but about history: ·Worms have played a more important part in the history of the world than most persons would at first assume”. How do worms make history? They make it by making vegetable mould, which makes possible "seedlings of all kinds; which makes possible an earth hospitable to humans, which makes possible the cultural artifacts, rituals, plans, and endeavours of human history (Mould, 309). Worms also "make history" by preserving the artifacts that humans make: worms protect "for an indefinitely long period every object, not liable to decay, which is dropped 00 the surface of the land, by burying it beneath their castings; a service for which"archaeologists ought to be grateful to worms". Darwin claims that worms inaugurate human culture and then, working alongside people and their endeavours, help preserve what people and worms together have made. Darwin does not claim that worms intend to have this effect so beneficial to humankind, or that any divine intention is at work through them. Rather, that the exertions of worms contribute to human history and culture is the unplanned result of worms acting in conjunction and competition with other (biological, bacterial,chemical, human) agents. Darwin describes the activities of worms as one of many "small agencies" whose "accumulated effects" turn out to be quite big.' It would be consistent with Darwin to say that worms participate in heterogeneous assemblages in which agency has no single locus, no mastermind, but is distributed across a swarm of various and variegated vibrant materialities.'

My response:

Kimberley's text is from 'the prosthetic pedagogy of art -embodied research and practice' by Charles R Garoian - I do not have a copy just a link.

My response - the red line that became an act of frottage is the wax crayon lifted the wood grain from my desk. This was a beautifully serendipitous event as the text refers to a student project in which a piece of wood is sand down to dust, combined with cake batter and then consumed by the critique group in the form of muffins. This moment excited me. The work produced itself and the link was visible but accidental.

Think about how the work is guided, incidental and deliberate or unconsidered.

Student task: create instructions - set up instructions for the object. BREAK OUT GROUP - Bob MA1 and Jon MA3
my suggestion: wear your object while manipulating it for as long as possible.
Their suggestions: Cut it, re-assemble it and turn it around
use the tape
We settle on wearing the object for the rest of the instructions.

Back together - we go first - so we asked everyone to wear it
The next instruction was to create it into an object - most people took it off,
tutors to read every third word from their pieces alternatively - excavating the piece - this was difficult and turned the activity around on to the tutors. we did not create work from this. I continued to wear my piece.
The synchronicity was what was being asked for - regurgitating work, collaborative - for the tutors to partake in, so the task was changed.
The task turned in to the tutors reading a word from the initial text - the instructions were slightly lost on my due to the connection. - Thrive - it was awkward, Caroline said 'abrasive' . the negotiation of practice. process.

Lastly we were asked to do something drastic with the piece, and then put it back together. It was left open for interpretation. I ripped my piece off of my head, in to segments and taped it together in a longer format. It was then attached by the tape, using different tape, to the wall of my studio space.